We finished our optimization. Here is the result of the final setup:
Unit (in) | Outer Diameter | Inner Diameter | Thickness (injection side) | Thickness (Weld side) | Height |
O.1 | 2.508 | 2.38 | 0.063 | 0.063 | 0.684 |
O.2 | 2.507 | 2.384 | 0.061 | 0.064 | 0.688 |
O.3 | 2.509 | 2.384 | 0.062 | 0.064 | 0.687 |
O.4 | 2.509 | 2.385 | 0.061 | 0.066 | 0.689 |
O.5 | 2.509 | 2.381 | 0.063 | 0.063 | 0.686 |
O.6 | 2.51 | 2.382 | 0.061 | 0.065 | 0.69 |
O.7 | 2.507 | 2.383 | 0.062 | 0.065 | 0.688 |
O.8 | 2.507 | 2.379 | 0.062 | 0.064 | 0.689 |
O.9 | 2.51 | 2.385 | 0.06 | 0.064 | 0.688 |
O.10 | 2.508 | 2.38 | 0.062 | 0.066 | 0.686 |
Average | 2.5084 | 2.3823 | 0.0617 | 0.0644 | 0.6875 |
Std | 0.00117379 | 0.00221359 | 0.000948683 | 0.00107497 | 0.00177951 |
Comment: OD and ID are slightly bigger than the design. The thickness is fairly uniform everywhere. Since the face IM team increased the face diameter, they fit really well together.
Updated Gantt Chart: